Monday, April 13, 2020

The lockdown reveals the weakness of capitalism and its underlying structures

Looking forward to the future of business

Rizal Philippines
April 13, 2020

Govt eyes 15-day lockdown extension


As a non business course undergraduate, I struggled as I was starting business to understand more about business, to study economics, money banking credit and finance, entrepreneurship.  These were some of the things:

1.  That banks have been most influential in expansion of business, especially the fractional reserve system, where little actual money can be made to multiply based on inverse of reserve requirements ie where the reserve requirement for banks is 20%, the money can be multiplied five times and so on.  Much of the economy is based on debt.  That if you have an economy say P5million, the liquidity that circulates maybe only 1/5

2.  That business that progress needs its own money to finance its growth:   be it a stock offering, a debenture, or credit cards to finance consumer financing.    A business that does not do that, can grow organically, like a tree slowly;   Like the SM group business when it used GC to increase purchase by its customers, eventually starting a bank that offers CC

3.  That a bank rather than a collector of savings, create money by creating credits.  US for instance, has
grown from about $20 trillion in debt, created by Federal Reserve banks, investment  banks and credit card companies.  Debts and more debts create progress in Western Countries.

4.  A central bank, due to fiat currency system creates money out of thin air.

     1. When issuing money:  

         Dr.       Coins and currency                        xxxx

                                Coins and currency in circulation             xxxx

        the issuance of which is limited by ability of the Central Banks ability to print money

   2.  When lending to banks (as in buying bonds and debt instruments)

        Dr      xxx              Loans

                        Due to  Banks                                 xxxx

      expands money supply without corresponding increase in  real assets as gold in  the vault of the
      Central bank

     The Central Bank of China has been more adroit by investing the money in gold and strategic
      commodities and oil rather than just Loans.  Also invests in strategic oil companies.  China has most
      gold, and even TN...

5.  A business is an important component of the capitalist system:  it creates jobs and employment
     and keeps the money, the cash flow circulating.  Say for instance as a common example, you pay a
     jeepney driver P10.00 for the fare, this P10.00 goes around to benefit:

     1. Him and his family
     2.  The spare parts vendor and employees
     3.  The spare parts factory and employees
     4.  The gasoline station and its employees
     5. The carinderia where the jeepney driver eats
     6.  The repair shops;
     7. The ME oil producers, refineries, oil tankers - owners and seafarers
     8.  The banks and investors financing #7
     9.  The govt collecting the vat, the excise tax from numerous transactions going around the country -
          from thousands of gasoline stations located nationwide

   The govt does not dole out anything to keep the system going and to provide jobs to the millions in the country

6.  The whole industry is interdependent and is a system.  The supply chain is a delicate system.  A defect in one disrupts and  stops the capitalist system (just like a war)

Here comes the lockdown:  which prescribes the closure of non esssential  business, transportation so that people can stop moving and prevent the spread of virus.  Life or business decision.

Here are the effect:

1.  Business stops;
2.  People lose their jobs
3. Jobless seeks money from govt;
4. Govt finds out  it has the budget but no liquidity because it has stopped business - no one pays the taxes
    including the one due on April 15 2020

This is the weakness. We are not prepared for this.   Its worse than a bank run.  Its a nationwide depletion and stoppage of economy and cash flow.   A bitter pill to swallow. Now we see/forecast up to 80% reduction in business,  expansion mode is on hold while others see closure /bankruptcy at their door, sapping the strength of the banking sector..


5.  Many people dependent on other jobs:   like jeepney drivers, vendors are impoverished and may soon go hungry and riot

With the lockdown, the whole capitalist system, the banking system collapses.    With the extension of payment of rents and other credits, the cash flow so necessary for the banking system stops. Even the govt, pathetically sees that there is no money at the barrel... It has to borrow from abroad.

The lockdown effectively crushed the capitalist system dead on its tracks.  The system built up very hard by business has ground to a standstill.   It may take years to bring back the business to its former status just 30 days ago.  And it will entail huge amounts of money.  Business may decline 1% of GDP   (about mere $3B) as estimated by experts.  I would say 40% to 50%

When the system hums on its own, the govt does not have headache nor logistical problems.  The crisis breeds a lot of problem

Innovation in modern warfare - Unrestricted Warfare

Looking forward to the future of business

Rizal Philippines
April 13, 2020.

The world's current relationship with China, ie the origin of CCP Covid 19, brings out the new innovation in China's conduct of relationship with the world.  Unrestricted Warfare, conceived in 1999 by two Colonels at PPA.  The way China conducts its affairs now with the world, with the Phl, is not only Machiavellian, two faced strategy but under the tenets enumerated in this paper. This could very well be sequel to Art of War of Sun Tzu in the modern times.

Unrestricted warfare











Using unrestricted warfare in foreign policy



Some years ago, I taught in a leading university graduate school course innovation as part of entrepreneurship course.   The rule in innovation is first there is no rule.

Thus, this document could very well entitled innovation in military principles.

Due to the emergence of Covid 19 infecting more than a million, and killing more than 60,000 and bringing down the whole world to its knees (crash of stockmarket, shortage of hospital supplies, lack of vaccine) this document comes to our mind, having been mentioned in number of documents and videos, ie that this writing must have been imbibed by the civilian and military leaders in China to pursue this action.

The authors, colonels at PLA wrote this document in February 1999 and talks about use of means military and non military means to achieve a country's goal of achieving its goal (of dominating another country)
Qiao Liang and Wang Xiashou.  

The document should be read by our civilian and military leaders (at National Defense College) which teaches military stragegy.  While we struggling with politics, our would be master are putting one over us, for using a combination of military and non military means.    (Some in the govt, by using media in battle for supremacy are employing some of the principles.)

Some of the notes/observations in document

1.   War is an activity using military and non military means, using limited resources to achieve superiority over other nations

2. Might is right.   Those who have more soldiers and weapons win the war

3. Use of technology in weapons:   technology dictate the weapon to be used, or warfare dictate what technology to be used.

4. With technology the distinction between military and non military action becomes blurred.

5.  With high technology comes the need for a variety of weapons to achieve a goal.  As much as 300 weapons are needed to win a war. Sometimes the search for high tech weapon could bankrupt a country as it did to Russia (as it is doing to US where a B2 bomber cost can exceed $billions

6. There are variety of weapons to be used in todays conflict:   financial, trade and ecological (like poisoning lakes and  rivers/water supply) and the effects could be more devastating than a nuclear war. 

7.  There should be distinction between soldiers of war, and/or hackers or financiers like George Soro who can disrupt currency exchange rate, or can disrupt computer network.    And  a wise general/leader should be able to exploit both military and non military means to subjugate other nations...   The scope and breath of war has radically changed. 

8. The Desert Storm War:

     Some lessons learned:

     1.  It was  42 day war accomplished in 38 days with Air Force taking the lead

     2.  The main weapon of victory were the helicopters but were not noticed after the war

     3. It was achieved at great cost of $61B and was like shooting birds with golden bullets

     4. The war worked because of reorganization of DOD between Powell and Schwarskopf
          But the US military did not learn from it because of conflict among Airforce, Navy and Army

     5.  It worked because of addition and combination (of allied forces which was worked on brilliantly
         by diplomats

     6.  War can be fought side by side with media (CNN) because it can be used as propaganda
          and could change the disposition and morale of enemies

     7.   Powell and Schwarzkopf, although they won the Desert Storm could not be considered great
          generals because they used traditional methods using high tech weapons to win the war.

         They did not understand the new concept of war.  Modern warfare..

9.  Some recommendation:

    1. Use of golden number (as in Da Vinci Code)   1:681

    2. Side by side;  addition

    3. Cocktails (mixture of  means to achieve superiority)

    4.  Removing boundaries: between military means and non military means, personnel and weapons.
         A modem a cp, laptop could be as lethal as a nuclear bomb.  Or a tomahawk. 

   Thus the  defensive measures must cover:  bio warfare
                                                                  trade warfare
                                                                  financial warfare
                                                                  defenses vs hacking  and intrusion into firewalls
     aside from the military front...

Many of the Generals could be inept in adapting these methods and strategy

Sunday, December 22, 2019

Amazon cuts ties with FedEx - will this affect long term value of Fed Ex?

Looking forward to the future of business

Rizal Philippines
December 22, 2019

Just 2 days before Christmas.  Merry Christmas every one


Image result for Amazon drives down value of Fedex


Image result for Amazon drives down value of Fedex





Image result for Amazon drives down value of Fedex


Image result for Amazon drives down value of Fedex



Image result for Amazon drives down value of Fedex
                                                Amazons own Prime deliveries



Image result for Amazon drives down value of Fedex


From Bloomberg - Amazon ends ground delivery by Fed ex

Amazon recently announced that it was halting ground deliveries via Fed Ex, in retaliation to announcement that it was evaluating agreements with Amazon.   Will this affect the long term value of Fed Ex.   Fed Ex says no Because Amazon business is just 1.3% of its total revenues.   Some say it will because Amazon, having its Prime Delivery system which delivers more on time and has more systems in place will undercut Fed Ex in many markets.  Faced with the reduction in world wide revenues due to tariff wars with China, Fed ex sees reduction in revenues and stock market prices.

Stock market prices of  Fed Ex fell 1.6%;  Amazon 1.1%

Amazon has been leasing jets for next day delivery. and has sorting centers near the airport and employed last mile truck owners contractors.    In a recent survey Amazon topped the on time delivery at 94% with Fed ex at 4th place at 90%

Its either Fed Ex or Amazon announcing that Fed Ex will stick to Walmart and other companies which are on e commerce platform.

From Seattle Times - Fed Ex Net Income falls 40% due to severance with Amazon, shorter holiday period, and higher cost.   Its profit for same period for same period was $935 million now down to only $650 million

Analysts sees a weakened and less valuable company in the next five years, which will precipitate a take over.  And Amazon will prevail... Because Amazon has its own internal source of Revenues;  Fed Ex has none.  Will Walmart take over Fed Ex to adopt the business model of Amazon.


Water companies value dip P127 value after spat with govt - where is systems thinking here?

Looking forward to the future of business

Rizal Philippines
December 22, 2019


Image result for Manila water stocks plunges after govt ends term extension


Just 2 days before Christmas, time to be happy and to celebrate.

Not for the executives, employees of the two water distributors:  Maynilad and Manila water, their employees and investors.

Which includes the govt pensions who owns large chuks of two water companies and the pensioners whose pensions are at risk, what with huge loss of value of the pensions shareholding.  The value  of water companies dived byas as much as $2.4 billion in a single day of trading, after it was announced that the term extension of the water companies will not be allowed.

P127 Billion lost due to Dutertes spat with water companies   

What are we talking about as oligarchs?  They Ayala and MVP  are simply heads, executive and not the sole owners.   of the water companies and since they are public held/listed companies, the small investors are the oligarchs are to be sent to jail as well?  Not to mention the P17 billion exposure of local banks to these water companies. All ready they are no longer releasing loans

Hinay hinay lang sirs.

It is worth noting that what was lacking in the actions and thought process is systems thinking ie that nothing is the world is now linear cause and effect and that one decision affects a myriad of other factors and elements.  The demise, malfunction causes malfunction of others.   It was part of the book of Hibino and Nadler   PDF Breakthrough Thinking  It is change in mindset, not rhethoric or bragadoccio, not high ratings


The top guns may brush aside this post as another mere academic ek ek. But practicing this will not get us to this dilemna, and another problem of the pension fund inability to pay the pensioners because of this showmanship.   (The estimated loss to the govt pension and SSS is about P4 billion - peanuts eh.) No one can advise the Chief to analyze the effect of decisions on the nation as he shoots from the hip?  I have an acquaintance who is a Usec who have strong ties with the Chief and who can advise...

What about perception of the investing companies of the Philippines as an investment haven?   Loss of confidence due to impetuousness of the leader?

Another case in point.   Non renewal of Franchise of TV and radio of ABS CBN.  Think of the possible exit plans of the said company:

      1.  They have alternative TV and radio station to go to, ABC 5 which is languishing, the TV station of JIL

      2. The company  is now a content producer:  TV shows movies magazines etc. which they can simply distribute.

      3.  They have IWAN TV  that is a pay for view platform for their movies and other shows.

Who cares sir if you  throw me in the river sir?   Will the turtle drown sirs...

Well the head of state is the head of state.  We are simply analyzing the problems that are being caused by certain decision.    Things will be better.

Sunday, December 8, 2019

What hath grab and UBER done to the car sales - why buy a car when you can grab

Looking forward to the future of business

Rizal Philipppines
December 2019

Image result for grab car

Plenty.  It means lower sales.  Now consumers see less desire to buy  new cars.  They can get their rides,  new cars pa, safe and convenient via apps.  With stringent rules on parking areas, garage before you can buy, strict anti no parking laws, one is less likely to buy a new car.  Compound that with the traffic, and increasing cost of ownership:   service cost at casa, insurance, accidents, road rage abusive jeepney drivers, traffic enforcers,.  Why buy a car when you can Grab?

Toyota has partnered with Grab at least to get a share of the market for initial car sales

This business model is a viable model as:

1.  The buyer earns much, Grab just gets a commission only
2.  The driver behavior is controlled
3.  There is less chance of abusive drivers (the drivers will not earn if they misbehave)
4.   Less expense on the part of the operator since the going around is minimized;  there are always ready users.
5.  The model is self liquidating;  the revenue of owner is enough to pay for monthly amortization of the unit that is under installment (that is why the FX and UV transport became popular)

Retail apocalypse likely to continue for the next 7 years, shuttering 17,000 stores? Grim landscape for retailers

Looking forward to the future of business

Rizal Philippines
December 2019

From Business Insider - Retail apocalypse continuing

snowy deserted empty mall
                                     This shuttered mall symbolizes the difficulty in this business


About 8,000 retail stores have closed shop this 2019 which include Gap Stores, K mart, Sears.  Most hard hit are electronic and clothes store.

The trend is likely to continue for the next 7 years.  The reason:   on line shopping e commerce  On line shopping which is  at 16% now will be at 25% in 2026 says UBS.  All ready Amazon has increased its sales by $38 billion which is the equivalent of 7,000 brick and mortar stores.   American on line spending is roughly $5,000 per family

Why is ecommerce on the  rise:  
1.  Less hassle of parking and walking around the store;
2.  More warranties:   free return of merchandise available
3.  You can chat with the store on the  products (not Chinese sites)
4.  You spend less effort (walking) and time going through their products.

This is made possible by convenient payment options:   credit card, Pay Pal, Pay Maya and convenient delivery system (hehe tell that to Lazada which has a number of misdelivery, wrong delivery, missing delivery) especially if products come from China.

Ayala which has formerly focussed on brick and mortart mallss realizes the changing trend and has bought an on line retailer:  Zalora to its portfolio.  Those who still are into brick and mortar store may see the need as their sales plateau and /or taper off (much worse decline)

This post is bearish on restaurants and retails:

Retail:

1.   Strong competition
2.   Paper thin profits
3.  Thefts (shoplifting) and rotting inventories (BO) or out  of trend stocks abound
4.  High labor costs

That tops up threats from competition -  e commerce

Restaurants:

1.  It deals with wants which is very volatile.   Customer wants change constantly
2.  Tastes of consumers is trendy -  Customers may want chicken now but tomorrow it
      may be salad, or vice versa
3.  Thus, Jollibee in US sees failure with its Smashburger in the US, or BK closing many of its stores
      Those that flourish like KFC in the Philippines are innovative in their menus to fit the changing wants
4.   Restaurants are in the food eaten out of the house category.  There are still food eaten in the  house category, and in difficult times,  families will scrimp on  eating outside the house.  Go back to basics

Those with long term prospects business are still in:

1. Finance
2.  Real estate
3.  Transportation
4.  Energy
5.  Communications

This will force rethinking on business investments and innovation.   Which this site professes.  They are huge spending sprees to build brick and mortar stores.  Time to reflect as we see the current landscape of retailing and food eaten outside the house

FMCGs and pharma  are now shifting to ecommerce platforms to cover all their bases.  Medicines, milk and other grocery items are available on line:

Benefits :

To the consumer:

1.  Convenience
    1. Shopping is done on line at the comfort of the home via android phone and even anywhere
    2. No traffic and parking head ache
    3. No waiting at check out counters and dizzying crowd

2.  Lower price
3.  Even deferred payment
4.  Delivery service at your door step.  No need to lug your purchase hail a cab which becomes rare on these occasion

To the retailer
1.  No bricks and mortars investment (except for DC as by Lazada and Ali Express - to control delivery
     and inventory

2.  In general, there are no inventories;   most transactions are flow through, and hence
3.  Little or 0 working capital requirement

To the manufacturer;
1.  Access to the existing customer of the  e commerce platform
2.  Minimal or little delivery to the store, less logistic requirement
3.  Less or zero collection from retailers (Direct to the Customer business model)