Social Icons

Thursday, May 31, 2012

Results of the Jeopardy Game Show




The objectives of the jeopardy we held last May 29, 2012 were the following:

l.  To test the knowledge or the amount of work put into the slideshare viewing assignment;
2.  To test the appetite of the students to risk;
3.  In the second jeopardy, the find out how well groups can strategize.

Since this was open books, notes, laptop, in actuality it was a test of who had faster computer, and who had better strategy of navigating the computer to find the answer.

I hope everybody had fun and lots of learning too.

Congratulations to group l.  they were quiet and conservative.

Congratulations to Group 4 for being aggressive and  a go getter.  We need  a lot of that in
entrepr4neurship  (It simply shows that in entrepreneurship, you have to keep trying, experimenting, you may may make up a lot of mistakes, but it is important to get up fight another day, and recover.

Thanks to the quizmasters:   Risha, Kathleen Lizette, and Mike.  You were amazing.





Prof. Jorge,
Good Morning.
By the way, below are the groupings and scores for the Jeopardy game:
Group 1 - 3000 (Krastle, Mina, Antonette, Andrew, Manny
Group 2 - 700 (Ed, John, Bel, Francis)
Group 3 - 2800 (Tin, Mafe, Arvin, Kristine)
Group 4 - 800 (Macky, Ton, Pao, Mhel)
Group 5 - 300 (Maynard, Mel, Renz, Rex, Carl)
Regards,
 x                                 Group 4 was enthusiastic, loud took a lot of risk and had fun



                           They had good searchers and led for a while and missed the top by 200


 x                                           All open, testing of IT abilities! (an infotech class?)



                             Search research abilities were tested to the hilt (Is this a research class?)


 x                                  Mike getting ;pissed off, he had to repeat for the nth time.



                                    Paolo was agrressive and had a happy group


 xz



                                      They nearly won.




                                           Thanks Mike









No comments:

Post a Comment